Full Text of Kei Komuro's 28-page Document #4

Note:  In the original text, footnotes are grouped together at the end of the text, but here, for the convenience of the reader, the footnotes for the relevant sections are placed at the end of the divided text.

 

Read Previous                                                                                 

7. About the article in Gendai Weekly released on November 30, 2020

 In the Weekly Gendai [Note 34] published on November 30, 2020, there was an article about what the ex-fiancee had said, and a similar article was published the following week on December 11. In these articles, it is mentioned that the ex-fiancee said that she would not ask for money, but there is no mention of the fact that she said she did not think the matter was settled.

 It also states that it was the document released by Mako on November 13, 2020 that led her to think about announcing that she would not ask for payment, but in fact, she had already expressed her intention not to ask for payment more than a year ago, and her intention to make it public was not announced until November 13. In fact, his intention not to ask for payment had already been expressed more than a year ago, and his desire to go public had already been clearly expressed in October, before November 13 [Note 35].

 Above all, the fact that the Komuro family consistently claimed that the money they received from the ex-fiancé was not a loan but a gift and that the financial problem had been solved in the discussions between the mother and the ex-fiancé is completely different. As I wrote mainly in "4," my mother and I have never publicly claimed the nature of the money from my fiancé, and even if not publicly, my mother and I have never claimed the nature of the money to my ex-fiancé since around August 2013 (see note 9 in "4"). ). We have never claimed that the money issue has been resolved (see "4" text and "4" note 8).

As mentioned above, in order to proceed with the discussion between my mother and my ex-fiancee, we tried to find out where the differences in our perceptions were, but the discussion has come to a halt at the "sorting out the differences in perceptions" stage. My ex-fiancee seems to be saying that the discussion did not proceed because my mother and I insisted that it was a gift and did not give in. As I wrote in "6" (6), I never informed my ex-fiancee about the loan except when I told her about my mother's and my ex-fiancee's perception that she loaned me the entrance fee in November 2010 and the tuition in the spring of the following year.

 And I told you this not to make a claim, but to discuss the discrepancy in perception. Immediately after that, she replied that she was mistaken about the entrance fee and tuition, and that she wanted to stop the discussion because she no longer wanted to request money and there was no need to discuss the matter (see "6" (7) and following). Note 36]. It is very regrettable that the discussion with the ex-fiancee has been discontinued and that the situation is as it is now.


 8. Conclusion
 I am sure that readers of this document will have various impressions and impressions. However, although there are recordings and other records of the events leading up to the release of the document in 2019, most of the information in this document has not been recorded. Although there are recordings and other records, much of it is based on my and my mother's perceptions. Therefore, some of you may think that this document is a one-sided account of my mother and me. Nevertheless, I would be happy if there is even one person who understands that there were various circumstances.

 April 8, 2021 (JST)

Kei Komuro

The following is a note

 Note 34] Shukan Gendai is a weekly magazine with which the reporter who was the contact person for the ex-fiancee had an exclusive contract, at least at the time he first met the agent on May 8, 2019 (see note 19 of "6").

 According to the Shukan Gendai article, the former fiancée informed the agent of this intention at the end of 2019, but it was precisely on November 13, 2019. Also, it was not until October 5, 2020, at the latest, that he clearly stated that he would announce this intention to the world. In any case, it is unreasonable to use the document released by Mako on November 13, 2020 as a reason.

 This is a hypothetical situation, but if the difference in perceptions between the two parties had not been resolved even after proper discussions had been held, and a confrontation had become unavoidable, we might have made our first claim regarding the nature of the money, as we did in August 2013. However, even in such a case, as explained in Note 9 of Section 4, it cannot be argued that we do not have to return the money because we received a gift.

 Above.

 Read Previous                                                                                 

Full Text of Komuro's 28-page Document #1

Full Text of Komuro's 28-page Document #2

Full Text of Komuro's 28-page Document #3

Full Text of Komuro's 28-page Document #4

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Kei Komuro Listed at Major U.S. Law Firm :There are Also Allegations of Career Fraud

Kei Komuro Receives "JFK Award": a New Allegation of Career Fraud?

Kei Komuro's Mother Criminally Charged with Fraud

What is Kei Komuro's Debt Problem

Classmate Bullying by Komuro

US to Pay for Mako and Kei's Security in the US, Japan Reports

Reported Scandals: The Japanese Will Never Accept Komuro

Kei Komuro Fails NY State Bar Exam?

Mako Komuro and Kei Attend Funeral of Mako's grandfather with Akishino Family

Former fiancée of Kei Komuro's mother releases comments: "I've asked Kei to convey her own wishes..."